Home » Psychology news » Scientists ‘bad at judging peers’ published work,’ says new study
Scientists ‘bad at judging peers’ published work,’ says new study
October 9, 2013 by NewsBot
Are scientists any good at judging the importance of the scientific work of others? According to a study published 8 October in the open access journal PLOS Biology (with an accompanying editorial), scientists are unreliable judges of the importance of fellow researchers' published papers...
Scientists ‘bad at judging peers’ published work,’ says new study
October 9, 2013 by NewsBot
Are scientists any good at judging the importance of the scientific work of others? According to a study published 8 October in the open access journal PLOS Biology (with an accompanying editorial), scientists are unreliable judges of the importance of fellow researchers' published papers...
